---------------------------- Pandemic conclusion 2023 ----------------------------

Brownstone Institute: https://brownstone.org/ - very interesting, most articles and topic to current situation

Conclusion sources:

Main alternative resources:

National Canada Citizens Inquiry https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
UK Column: https://www.ukcolumn.org/live
Brownstone Institute: https://brownstone.org/ - USA
Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de - Germany
Geopolitics and Empire: https://guadalajarageopolitics.com
Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org


Interesting links to follow:


Updated: 13.02.2024

PUTIN OUR SAVIOUR?!

Post Reply
alisonfletch
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2021 4:15 pm

PUTIN OUR SAVIOUR?!

Post by alisonfletch »

The big picture, whether you live in St Louis, London or Leningrad.

" Sadly, until we grasp that fact that the political systems
in which we still abide—no matter where we live on this planet—are designed to oppress and control us, we are likely to remain expendable pawns in perpetuity. To beseech the political class for remedy, while their power stems from the systems that are oppressing us, is slave mentality.

As Professor Mark Crispin Miller recently highlighted, perhaps in searching for hope, even the very best of us are potentially overlooking the malignancy of multipolarity, seeing enmity where it doesn't exist and ignoring complicity where it does.

This does not mean that Putin, Sunak, Schwab, Xi, Modi, Biden and other “global leaders” all agree on how the multipolar world order should be constructed; they simply agree that its time has come. The public disagreements and confrontations are often indicative of real squabbles, rather like the back-stabbing you might find in any boardroom.

They each have their sets of oligarchs behind them, and the oligarchic clans each want to maximise their own influence in the new global order. But, as can be seen from their statements and policy initiatives, all agree upon the framework of multipolarity, replete with its insidious technocratic control systems. They may bicker, but they all want the corporation to prosper, because it is the source of their fraction of global power, whether that fraction waxes or wanes.

If we consider, for example, the WEF’s Great Reset, what are our deepest concerns about the emerging global order it advocates? Is it not the global surveillance state? Have we ceased our opposition to the total enslavement that CBDCs will bring? Do we no longer wish to resist the imposition of social credit, the digital ID control grid, artificial GM food products, genetic modification tinkering with nucleosides, the biosecurity state and transhumanism?

If we still wish to oppose these oppressive control mechanisms, then why would we ever contemplate accepting, or even hope for, a multipolar world order? Is this not a global governance system led, as we have seen above, by the governments and political leaders that are furthest advanced in the actual, real-world installation of the technological panopticon?

The governments around the world that openly declare their support for the multipolar world order are no worse than their G7- and NATO-aligned counterparts. But the West also seeks multipolarity, if surreptitiously.

The proposed multipolar world order is neither new nor any kind of salvation. We should reject it—just as we should all ongoing attempts to subjugate humanity under the deceptive guise of global governance".


Iain Davis
Author, blogger, researcher and short film maker who writes mainly at IainDavis.com.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who-wa ... er-part-ii

Tags:
Post Reply